Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's skin disorders, specifically his contention that they are related to herbicide exposure and a fire on board the USS Oriskany.

The deciding factor: The examiner was not able to provide sufficient opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's skin disorders based on the provided information.

Claimed conditions
dermatitis, eczema, folliculitis, actinic keratosis, porphyria cutanea tarda
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 2, 2022
Citation
22005797

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22005797.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.