The Veteran's pituitary microadenoma and associated conditions have been rated at 10 percent since the appeal period began. The Board has found that a higher rating is not warranted due to lack of myxedema, weight gain, or other specific symptoms required for higher ratings.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not meet the criteria for higher ratings as defined by Diagnostic Code 7903 (hypothyroidism) and DC 4.115b (erectile dysfunction).
- Claimed conditions
- pituitary microadenoma, hyperprolactinemia, hypogonadism, hypothyroidism with thyroid nodule
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- February 3, 2022
- Citation
- 22006191
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22006191.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection for hypothyroidism is granted with an effective date of August 17, 1998. Service connection for hypogonadism was denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for hypogonadism with bilateral testicle atrophy is denied as there is no evidence of complete atrophy or removal of the testicles.
- Granted
The Board has granted readjudication of the issues of service connection for hypogonadism and gynecomastia due to new evidence received since the last rating decision. The claims of service connection for squamous blepharitis, upper and lower eyelid with dry eye syndrome and pinguecula, left eye, right eye are also remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. His bilateral hearing loss was rated as noncompensable throughout the period on appeal, while his other conditions (hypogonadism, diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, radiculopathies) did not meet the criteria for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.