The Board has granted service connection for pinguecula and allergic conjunctivitis, finding that the Veteran's reports of vision problems in service are credible and that these conditions are related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The Board found the Veteran's lay testimony regarding symptoms during service and subsequent diagnosis sufficient to establish a nexus between current eye disabilities (pinguecula and allergic conjunctivitis) and service.
- Claimed conditions
- pinguecula, allergic conjunctivitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 10, 2022
- Citation
- 22007744
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22007744.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the claims as there was no valid appeal to review.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as he does not have a current disability of hearing loss for VA purposes.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable initial rating for allergic conjunctivitis is denied due to inactive conjunctivitis with no evidence of impairment or disfigurement.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected eye disability does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation. The knee and psychiatric claims are remanded due to procedural errors.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for dry eye syndrome as proximately due to his service-connected tinnitus. The claims for cataracts, primary open-angle glaucoma, pinguecula, and corneal arcus are denied. The urticaria claim is remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.