Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for attention deficit disorder is denied as the evidence does not support a finding that it was incurred during service.,Service connection is granted for an acquired psychiatric disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder. The evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether these conditions manifested during service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for fibromyalgia is remanded due to the lack of a comprehensive VA examination addressing all pertinent evidence.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea is remanded due to the lack of a comprehensive VA examination addressing all pertinent evidence.

The deciding factor: The weight of the probative evidence does not show that the Veteran's attention deficit disorder was related to his in-service chemical exposure at Camp Lejeune.,There is evidence showing an acquired psychiatric disorder manifested during service and has persisted since then, with no clear indication it was caused by any other condition or event. The claim for secondary service connection will be considered as well.,The VA examiner did not address the Veteran's history of joint pain during active duty service and post-service fibromyalgia symptoms. A new examination is needed to determine if fibromyalgia is related to his acquired psychiatric disorder.,The VA examiner did not address the Veteran's history of sleep apnea during active duty service and post-service sleep issues. A new examination is needed to determine if sleep apnea is related to his acquired psychiatric disorder.

Claimed conditions
attention deficit disorder, acquired psychiatric disorder (unspecified anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder), fibromyalgia, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 22, 2022
Citation
22010205

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22010205.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.