The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 is remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding the cause of his left sural sensory polyneuropathy and whether it was caused by VA medical treatment.
The deciding factor: The Board found conflicting opinions from the same examiner regarding the etiology of the Veteran's left sural sensory polyneuropathy, requiring further clarification.
- Claimed conditions
- left ilioinguinal neuropathy, left sural sensory polyneuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 23, 2022
- Citation
- 22010309
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22010309.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA medical opinion to determine if the Veteran's left sural sensory polyneuropathy is related to his hernia surgery and whether this additional disability was caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or similar fault.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for left ilioinguinal neuropathy and left sural sensory polyneuropathy, finding that the additional disability was not proximately caused by VA's carelessness or negligence.
- Granted
The Veteran's left ilioinguinal neuropathy, a residual to his vasectomy and subsequent surgeries, has resulted in constant scrotal area pain that requires ongoing management with pain medication.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.