Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was granted, and she is now rated at 50% effective September 28, 2000. The July 2007 rating decision had incorrectly assigned a 30% disability rating.

The deciding factor: The correct facts showing that both of the Veteran's ovaries were removed during her in-service hysterectomy were not considered by the adjudicator, manifestly changing the outcome of the decision.

Claimed conditions
Total Hysterectomy, Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
50%
Decision date
February 24, 2022
Citation
22010607

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22010607.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.