The Board has remanded the issue of service connection for hepatitis B due to inadequate medical opinions and the need for additional private treatment records.,The Veteran's hyperaldosteronism and hypokalemia are being remanded as there were insufficient explanations in the previous VA examination regarding their onset, cause, or relation to herbicide exposure during service.,The Veteran's hypokalemia is also being remanded due to inadequate explanations from the previous VA examiner about its relationship to hyperaldosteronism and herbicide exposure.,The Board has remanded the issue of hypertension as there was insufficient explanation in the previous VA examination regarding its relation to herbicide exposure during service.
The deciding factor: The medical opinions provided were inadequate, lacking sufficient discussion on the Veteran's claimed exposures and their potential impact on his conditions.,There is a need for additional information about when these conditions started and if they are related to herbicide exposure or other factors.,The VA examiner did not provide adequate explanation regarding the relationship between hyperaldosteronism/hypokalemia and herbicide exposure, leaving room for speculation.,The VA examiner failed to address whether hypertension is due to herbicide exposure during service.
- Claimed conditions
- hepatitis B, hyperaldosteronism, hypokalemia, hypertension
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 24, 2022
- Citation
- 22010847
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22010847.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and increased rating for anxiety disorder have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability meeting the criteria for hypertension, and the Veteran's anxiety disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.