Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right wrist disorder is not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a link between the condition and his military service.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder remains on appeal as there are conflicting opinions regarding its onset in service.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disorder has been remanded for further examination and evaluation.,Service connection for a headache disorder is granted based on current medical evidence.,Tinnitus was granted service connection, effective October 13, 2016.

The deciding factor: There is no direct evidence linking the Veteran's right wrist disorder to his military service. The VA clinicians' opinions supported this conclusion by noting insufficient evidence of a chronic condition in service and lack of causation.,The VA clinician found that the Veteran's current acquired psychiatric disorders are more likely related to personal life factors rather than service events, but historical diagnoses were not fully addressed.,Further examination is needed to assess the current nature and severity of the Veteran's bilateral knee disorder. The examiner will consider all relevant symptoms and provide a comprehensive assessment.,The Veteran reported experiencing headaches during service and continues to experience them post-service. Current medical evidence supports this claim, warranting service connection for a headache disorder.,Tinnitus was granted based on its onset following weapons training in service and continued presence since then.

Claimed conditions
Right wrist disorder (carpal tunnel syndrome), Acquired psychiatric disorder, Bilateral knee disorder, Headache disorder, Tinnitus
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 25, 2022
Citation
22010979

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22010979.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.