The Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for ulnar neuropathy of the right upper extremity is remanded due to new evidence raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating his claim, and further examination is needed to determine if VA negligence caused additional disability.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that a remand is necessary as new evidence raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to potential negligence in post-operative care, and further examination is needed to determine if VA negligence caused additional disability.
- Claimed conditions
- ulnar neuropathy of the right upper extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 2, 2022
- Citation
- 22011915
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22011915.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for ulnar neuropathy of both upper extremities due to an inadequate VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient development and consideration of all relevant evidence, including a new VA examination that confirmed right upper extremity muscle weakness and burning sensations at night.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for ulnar neuropathy of the right upper extremity due to a negligent surgery performed at a non-VA facility in September 2012, and subsequent post-operative care at VA.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence received after a recent Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC). The Veteran's claim for an increased rating and TDIU remains on appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.