The Board has remanded the case due to issues regarding service connection for facial acne, which was reopened based on new evidence. The Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents during service in Vietnam is not at issue.
The deciding factor: The motion seeking revision of the September 1982 rating decision that reduced the rating for scars on posterior chest wall from 10 percent to noncompensable effective December 1, 1982, was denied as it did not contain an undebatable error of fact or law.
- Claimed conditions
- Muscle Injury of Thoracic Spine, Scars on Posterior Chest Wall
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 2, 2022
- Citation
- 22012081
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22012081.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.