The Veteran's eye conditions are being remanded for further examination and opinion regarding their relationship to service, including presumed herbicide exposure. The examiner must address whether the conditions are related to in-service injuries or treatment.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has not provided an adequate opinion on the relationship between his eye conditions and presumed herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- convergence insufficiency, eye condition (not specified)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 4, 2022
- Citation
- 22012597
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22012597.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examinations and the Veteran's hospitalization for a tibial fracture. The claim will be returned for further development, including scheduling an appropriate VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an initial compensable rating for convergence insufficiency to obtain a new medical examination that addresses diplopia caused by fatigue and whether the Veteran has a current diagnosis of dry eye syndrome or any other eye condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient efforts in obtaining post-service medical records and an inadequate VA examination. The AOJ is instructed to obtain copies of Dr. Koso's treatment records, make reasonable efforts to obtain them, and request a more detailed opinion on the nature and etiology of all current eye disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found service connection for convergence insufficiency, accommodative insufficiency, and photophobia affecting the left eye. However, the claim for a left eye refractive error is remanded due to inadequate prior opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.