The Veteran's chronic sinusitis is remanded for a new VA examination to determine if it is related to his military service or aggravated by the March 2011 injury.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is remanded for a new VA examination and opinion to reconcile conflicting medical opinions regarding its etiology, specifically whether it is secondary to TBI or obesity-related.,The Veteran's bilateral flatfoot is remanded for a new VA examination to determine if the condition preexisted service and was aggravated by active duty or ACDUTRA.,The Veteran's bruxism is remanded for a new VA examination to determine its etiology, including whether it is related to his TBI/PTSD.
The deciding factor: A new VA examination is needed as the current evidence does not clearly establish if the Veteran's chronic sinusitis is related to service or aggravated by the March 2011 injury.,The conflicting medical opinions regarding sleep apnea require a new VA examination and opinion to reconcile whether it is secondary to TBI, obesity-related, or both.,A new VA examination is needed to determine if the Veteran's bilateral flatfoot preexisted service and was aggravated by active duty or ACDUTRA.,A new VA examination is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's bruxism, including whether it is related to his TBI/PTSD.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic sinusitis, sleep apnea, bilateral flatfoot, bruxism
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 9, 2022
- Citation
- 22013549
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22013549.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea, finding that there was no evidence of a chronic disease manifesting within one year after service and concluding that the current disability is not related to his in-service deviated septum.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development regarding the Veteran's claim of service connection for sleep apnea. The Veteran will be provided with a VA examination to determine if his current sleep disorder is related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the issue of service connection for sleep apnea due to insufficient medical opinions and need for further development.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claims for sleep apnea and an increased disability rating for diabetes mellitus, type II.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.