Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

Service connection for asbestosis is granted.,Service connection for cause of death due to asbestosis is granted.,Service connection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to asbestos exposure is remanded.,Service connection for diabetes due to herbicide exposure is remanded.,Service connection for kidney failure due to herbicide exposure is remanded.,Service connection for heart condition is remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's asbestosis was related to in-service exposure to asbestos, and the death certificate lists asbestosis as a significant condition contributing to his death.,The Veteran's service-connected asbestosis substantially contributed to his death.,Exposure to asbestos is conceded. The examiner must address whether chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was related to active service or caused by military service, considering in-service exposure and the Veteran's history of heart conditions.,The appellant provided articles indicating that Agent Orange was used and/or stored at Guam and Okinawa. VA needs to verify this exposure before determining if it should be considered for service connection.,Exposure to herbicide agents is claimed but not verified. The AOJ must complete the necessary development to determine whether the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during service.,The examiner must address whether the heart condition preexisted service and, if so, whether it was aggravated by military service or related to active service.

Claimed conditions
asbestosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart condition, diabetes, kidney failure
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 14, 2022
Citation
22014494

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22014494.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.