The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development regarding his claim of compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of bilateral inguinal hernia surgery, including paralysis of bilateral lower extremities.
The deciding factor: Further clarification and documentation are needed regarding the informed consent process and the nature of any nerve block treatment that may have caused additional disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- paralysis of bilateral lower extremities, neuropathic pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 17, 2022
- Citation
- 22015510
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22015510.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal was denied as he did not file a timely substantive appeal following the issuance of a September 2019 Statement of the Case (SOC).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's surviving spouse is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for neuropathic pain from a left cheek cyst removal, which the Board has remanded due to inadequate medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining full consent documents and a VA medical opinion to determine if VA treatment caused any additional bilateral lower extremity disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary for the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, and TDIU claims due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the severity of his condition and need for aid and attendance. The SMC claim is also remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.