Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected residuals of left long finger amputation and left ring finger fracture is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the left leg below the knee amputation is also remanded.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, sleep apnea, and TDIU are remanded.,An opinion is needed to determine if the Veteran's left hand tingling, numbness, and loss of sensation were caused or aggravated by his service-connected conditions.,Another medical opinion is required to assess whether the Veteran's sleep apnea had its onset during service.

The deciding factor: The current rating for the Veteran's service-connected residuals does not account for all symptoms he experiences, including tingling and numbness in his left hand. The remand is necessary to obtain an opinion on this issue.,VA treatment providers did not provide proper care following the Veteran's left great toe amputation surgery, leading to a below-the-knee amputation of his left leg. The claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 is remanded as VA may have been at fault in this case.,The nature and etiology of the Veteran's sleep apnea need clarification. An opinion is required to determine if it had its onset during service or was otherwise related to service.,An opinion is needed to assess whether the Veteran's left hand tingling, numbness, and loss of sensation were caused by his service-connected conditions.,Another medical opinion is necessary to evaluate the nature and etiology of the Veteran's sleep apnea.

Claimed conditions
Residuals of left long finger amputation, Left ring finger fracture, Psychiatric disorder (related to stroke complications), Sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 21, 2022
Citation
22016255

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22016255.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.