The Board has denied all eleven earlier effective date claims for peripheral neuropathy disabilities, finding that the Veteran did not timely file a complete application within one year of his intent to file.
The deciding factor: The RO's August 2014 letter incorrectly stated that an intent to file would be recognized as the effective date if a formal claim was submitted within one year. This legal error does not allow for assignment of an earlier effective date.
- Claimed conditions
- peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity external popliteal, neuropathy, right lower extremity sciatica, peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity femoral nerve, peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity femoral nerve, peripheral neuropathy, external cutaneous nerve of the thigh, left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy, external cutaneous nerve of the thigh, right lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy, ilio-inguinal nerve, left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy, ilio-inguinal nerve, right lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy, obturator nerve, left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy, obturator nerve, right lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2022
- Citation
- A22021503
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A22021503.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted the Veteran's requests to readjudicate his claims for service connection for coronary atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus type II, but has remanded the cases due to new evidence received. The claims are being remanded for toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) medical opinions regarding any possible nexus between the Veteran's claimed exposures in Camp Lejeune and his conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's gastrointestinal condition, complete hysterectomy, peripheral neuropathy in the upper and lower extremities, and skin cancer are remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to service exposure to Agent Orange.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including depression and mood swings, cold weather injuries of the upper and lower extremities, ankle conditions, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, left hip condition, hypertension, and bilateral teeth condition. The evidence does not support a current diagnosis of any of these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for jaw and oral trauma, stomach condition (Crohn's disease), idiopathic hypersomnia, restless leg syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, and Raynaud's disease are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.