The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for painful residual scarring of the bilateral foot scars associated with bunionectomies was denied. The Veteran also had her claims for initial compensable ratings for residual left and right foot scars denied, as did her claim for a compensable rating for FSAD.,The Board granted service connection on secondary basis for a headache disorder.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not support the need for higher ratings based on the Veteran's scarring conditions. The Veteran had no additional scars noted in recent examinations, and her existing scars were not found to be unstable or painful.,Service connection was granted on secondary basis for a headache disorder due to the service-connected chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis.
- Claimed conditions
- Painful residual scarring of the bilateral foot scars associated with bunionectomies, Residual left foot scar, Residual right foot scar, Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 3, 2022
- Citation
- A22022255
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A22022255.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's urinary frequency is found to be secondary to her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery.,There is at least approximate balance of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's GERD is caused by her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery, female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), and vaginitis.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Veteran's service connection claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include alcohol use disorder, unspecified depressive disorder with anxious distress, and PTSD was granted. Other claims for various conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) due to a lack of evidence showing current diagnoses during or recent to the filing of the claim.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted a 100 percent rating for PTSD with major depressive disorder and TBI, service connection for female sexual arousal disorder secondary to the service-connected conditions, and special monthly compensation at the housebound rate. The appeal regarding entitlement to a TDIU was dismissed as moot.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.