The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the Veteran's prostate disorder and its relationship to his inservice herbicide exposure. The Veteran is advised that a VA examination is needed to determine the nature of his prostate disorder, which may qualify as prostate cancer, and whether it is at least as likely as not related to his service-connected herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The Board found insufficient medical evidence to make a decision regarding the relationship between the Veteran's prostate disorder and his inservice herbicide exposure, necessitating further examination.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate disorder
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2022
- Citation
- A22022418
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A22022418.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a medical examination to clarify the current diagnosis of prostate disorder and determine if it is related to service, including exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War Era.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions have been remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions. The effective date for tinea unguium remains denied, and the other issues are pending further review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's hypertension, prostate disorder, and sleep apnea are secondary to his service-connected PTSD. However, due to a duty to assist error, the case is being remanded for further evaluation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new and relevant evidence received since previous decisions. The Veteran's claims are related to exposure in Vietnam, but VA has not conceded herbicide agent exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.