Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has found a pre-decisional error in not fulfilling its duty to assist and is remanding the case for further action, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the appellant's behavior during his periods of AWOL.

The deciding factor: There was an omission in providing a VA medical opinion on whether the appellant's behavior was due to disease at the time of his offenses, which could affect the determination of dishonorable discharge status.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 10, 2022
Citation
A22022816

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A22022816.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.