The Board has determined that new and relevant evidence has been received since the previous decisions, warranting readjudication of the Veteran's claims for service connection for a genitourinary disability and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a urinary disability.
The deciding factor: New evidence was submitted by the Veteran that raises a theory of entitlement not previously addressed in his previous appeals, specifically regarding informed consent to surgery and resulting need for continuous medication.
- Claimed conditions
- genitourinary disability, urinary disability
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 18, 2022
- Citation
- A22025768
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A22025768.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and service connection prior to June 27, 2024, for a genitourinary disability were dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a genitourinary disability due to insufficient evidence of a current disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for pseudofolliculitis barbae, a urinary disability, and a skin disability (excluding PFB), including a claimed rash of the chest and back, to correct an error by the AOJ under the Appeals Modernization Act.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for bilateral pes planus and denied the claims for a urinary disability, an earlier effective date for erectile dysfunction, and compensable ratings for pseudofolliculitis barbae, right ankle scars, and other conditions. The cervical spine and GERD with gastritis claims were remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.