Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for ischemic heart disease (IHD) is denied as he did not have a diagnosed disability prior to or at the time of his death.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension (HTN) and stroke, claimed as secondary to HTN, is remanded due to insufficient evidence addressing whether these conditions are related to herbicide exposure during service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder including PTSD is also remanded due to insufficient evidence addressing whether this condition is related to HTN or other service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: Without a diagnosed disability, even the provisions for presumptive service connection cannot apply to warrant a grant of service connection.,The requested VA addendum medical opinion did not address whether the Veteran's hypertension was due to his presumed in-service herbicide exposure or as secondary to other conditions. The National Academy of Sciences' findings suggest an association between hypertension and herbicide agent exposure, but this has not been addressed by the VA examiner.,The claims for service connection for acquired psychiatric disorder including PTSD are remanded because insufficient evidence addresses whether these conditions are related to HTN or other service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Ischemic heart disease (IHD), Hypertension (HTN), Cerebral vascular accident (CVA) - Stroke, Acquired psychiatric disorder including PTSD
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 9, 2022
Citation
22027209

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22027209.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.