The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for liver soft tissue carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as a result of herbicide exposure due to incomplete medical records and insufficient VA etiology opinions. The case is being sent back for further development, including obtaining additional relevant records and seeking an independent medical expert opinion.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the current VA etiology opinions are lacking in rationale and complexity, necessitating a more detailed examination by an independent medical expert to address the specific issues raised in the Veteran's claims.
- Claimed conditions
- liver soft tissue carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 11, 2022
- Citation
- 22027918
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22027918.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for esophageal cancer and remanded the claim for further development regarding a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inadequate opinions and new evidence. The Veteran is presumed exposed to herbicide agents in Vietnam, but his GIST does not meet the definition of a soft tissue sarcoma.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for fibromyalgia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) as there is no evidence of a current disability or in-service injury, disease, or exposure that would support these claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the RO failed to provide proper VCAA notice and is therefore remanding the case for further action.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.