The reduction in the disability rating for tonic-clonic seizures from 40 percent to 20 percent, effective September 1, 2017, was not proper and the 40 percent evaluation is restored.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show a material improvement in the Veteran's tonic-clonic seizures as required by VA regulations for reducing disability ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- Tonic-clonic seizures
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- May 13, 2022
- Citation
- 22028418
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22028418.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for tonic-clonic seizures or grand mal seizures was granted effective December 18, 2012. A rating of 20% was assigned from that date to August 6, 2014.,After the initial grant of service connection, the Veteran's condition improved and he has not experienced any major seizures in over three years.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's petition to reopen his claim of service connection for a seizure disorder and has determined that he incurred this condition during active duty. The decision is based on evidence showing diagnoses of seizures both in-service and post-service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.