Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability has been reopened, but the Board finds that new and material evidence does not establish an in-service injury or disease. The current knee condition is also not related to service.,Service connection for a bilateral knee disability cannot be established as there is no credible evidence of an in-service injury or event leading to current symptoms.,The Veteran's claim for high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and heart disease are remanded due to the need to determine if he served within 12 nautical miles from Vietnam shores during his service aboard USS Okinawa. The claims for sleep apnea and an acquired psychiatric disorder (likely depression) also require additional development.,Service connection for a respiratory disorder is remanded as the Veteran needs to confirm his report of exposure to burning feces in service.,The Veteran's bilateral foot disability claim requires further examination to determine if it is related to service.

The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence linking current back or knee conditions to service. The Veteran's statements about pain during service are inconsistent and not supported by contemporaneous medical records.,Service connection for a bilateral knee disability cannot be established as there is no credible evidence of an in-service injury or event leading to current symptoms.,The need to determine if the Veteran served within 12 nautical miles from Vietnam shores, which could establish herbicide exposure and presumptive service connection. The claims for sleep apnea and depression require additional medical records to confirm the nature and etiology of these conditions.,Service connection for a respiratory disorder requires confirmation of the Veteran's report of exposure to burning feces in service.,The need for further examination to determine if current bilateral foot condition is related to service.

Claimed conditions
Back disability, Bilateral knee disability, High blood pressure, Diabetes mellitus, Heart disease, Respiratory disorder, Bilateral foot disability, Obstructive sleep apnea, Acquired psychiatric disorder (likely depression)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 18, 2022
Citation
22029334

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22029334.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.