Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's dental condition for compensation purposes is denied as there is no evidence of a compensable dental disability.,A separate 10 percent rating is granted for frequent UTIs related to service-connected testicular contusion, but the issue of higher ratings remains remanded due to lack of medical opinion on the relationship between current foot disabilities and service connection.,The Veteran's right and left foot disabilities are remanded as VA has not provided a medical examination or opinion regarding their etiology.,The Veteran's residuals from testicular contusion require a compensable rating, but the issue is also remanded due to lack of medical opinion on the relationship between current symptoms and service connection.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a dental condition for which compensation can be granted.,The Veteran's UTIs are rated at 10 percent under old criteria, but higher ratings are not available due to lack of supporting medical evidence. The issue remains remanded as VA has not provided an opinion on the relationship between current symptoms and service connection.,VA has not provided a medical examination or opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's foot disabilities. The issue is also remanded for this reason.,The Veteran's residuals from testicular contusion require a compensable rating, but VA has not provided an opinion on whether these current symptoms are related to service connection.

Claimed conditions
Dental condition, UTIs (Frequent), Right foot disability, to include plantar fasciitis and pes planus, Left foot disability, to include plantar fasciitis and pes planus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 20, 2022
Citation
22029891

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22029891.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.