The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete records and inadequate examination, requiring further development and opinion.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner failed to adequately address the Veteran's lay statements regarding his symptoms during service and risk factors for BPH in determining the etiology of his prostate condition.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 24, 2022
- Citation
- 22030698
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22030698.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran was granted compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1151 for trauma to his prostate, urethra, bladder and erectile dysfunction caused by a foley catheter being accidentally pulled out during back surgery performed by VA in March 2019.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient examination reports and missing records. The Veteran's prostate condition is related to his in-service injury, but the examiner did not have access to all relevant medical records. The psychiatric claim requires a second opportunity for an examination as the Veteran may have missed the first one due to lack of communication.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a prostate disability, an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD (including anxiety and depression), diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.,Service connection was not granted as the preponderance of evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to inadequate opinions regarding service connection for prostate and urinary disorders. The case will be returned for further examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.