The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for peripheral vascular disease and kidney dysfunction due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents, as well as their relationship to service-connected coronary heart disease (CAD) and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The AOJ is instructed to obtain additional medical opinions that address Dr. Shoag's opinion regarding the link between these conditions.
The deciding factor: The VA clinician provided insufficient rationale for the negative opinions on the Veteran's service connection claims, particularly failing to discuss Dr. Shoag's opinion and providing a conclusory statement without addressing the specific issues raised in the case.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), left lower extremity (LLE), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), right lower extremity (RLE), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), right upper extremity (RUE), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), left upper extremity (LUE), Kidney Dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 25, 2022
- Citation
- 22030772
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22030772.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's chronic infection following a July 2009 splenectomy was not caused by VA negligence or fault, and the event was not reasonably foreseeable. As such, he is not entitled to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Granted
Service connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is granted. The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.