Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's allergic rhinitis is not manifested by greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides, complete obstruction on one side, or polyps. As such, his claim for a compensable rating for allergic rhinitis is denied.,The Board finds that the August 2014 VA examination for constipation to be inadequate and remands this matter in order to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's constipation is related to service or aggravated by major depressive disorder.,The Board finds that the August 2014 VA examination for hemorrhoids to be inadequate and remands this matter in order to obtain a new VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's hemorrhoids are related to service.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a compensable rating for allergic rhinitis as there is no documentation of greater than 50 percent obstruction, complete obstruction on one side, or polyps.,The August 2014 VA examination was inadequate and the Veteran's statements regarding his constipation need to be considered. The examiner must address whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's reported constipation is related to service or aggravated by major depressive disorder.,The August 2014 VA examination for hemorrhoids was inadequate and the Veteran's descriptions of post-service symptoms need to be taken into consideration. The examiner must provide a thorough opinion regarding whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's reported hemorrhoids are related to service.

Claimed conditions
Allergic rhinitis, Constipation, Hemorrhoids
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 3, 2022
Citation
22032761

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22032761.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.