The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to conflicting medical opinions and incomplete information regarding his periods of active duty, ACDUTRA, and INACDUTRA. The AOJ must obtain updated treatment records, personnel files, and pay stubs; clarify the dates of each period of active duty, ACDUTRA, and INACDUTRA; and seek VA opinions to determine etiology and date(s) of onset for hypertension and any neurological disability affecting his extremities.
The deciding factor: The Board found conflicting medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed disabilities and incomplete information about his periods of active duty, ACDUTRA, and INACDUTRA. The AOJ must obtain updated treatment records, personnel files, and pay stubs to clarify this information.
- Claimed conditions
- neurological disability affecting the arms, wrists, and hands, neurological disability affecting the legs and feet, hypertension
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 7, 2022
- Citation
- 22033295
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22033295.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and increased rating for anxiety disorder have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability meeting the criteria for hypertension, and the Veteran's anxiety disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.