Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and consideration of all diagnoses during the appeal period.,Service connection for bilateral knee disability is remanded due to the need for a VA examination considering in-service stressors and current symptoms.,Service connection for bilateral hip disability is remanded due to the need for a VA examination considering in-service stressors and current symptoms.,Service connection for back disability is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and consideration of all relevant medical records.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus was incurred during service, with reasonable doubt resolved in his favor.,PTSD criteria were not met based on the July 2015 VA examination. A new VA examination is needed to consider other diagnoses and stressors.,In-service stressors are relevant for bilateral knee disability. The Veteran should be provided a VA examination to determine if current conditions pre-existed service or underwent an increase in severity due to service.,In-service stressors are relevant for bilateral hip disability. The Veteran should be provided a VA examination to determine if current conditions pre-existed service or underwent an increase in severity due to service.,The February 2017 VA examiner found the low back strain is less likely than not related to in-service complaints and treatment, but further evidence is needed.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, an acquired psychiatric disorder (including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)), bilateral knee disability, bilateral hip disability, back disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 9, 2022
Citation
22033917

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22033917.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.