Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's sarcoidosis is not related to service, including exposure to contaminated water and/or asbestos at Camp Lejeune.,Multiple myeloma is not confirmed. The examiner will determine if POEMS syndrome is multiple myeloma or falls under the category of multiple myeloma and provide an opinion on its relationship to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,POEMS syndrome is not related to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,The Veteran's thyroid condition, including as secondary to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and POEMS syndrome, is not related to service.,The Veteran's kidney condition, including as secondary to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and POEMS syndrome, is not related to service.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a causal relationship between the Veteran's sarcoidosis and exposure to contaminated water or asbestos in service.,POEMS syndrome is either multiple myeloma or falls under the category of multiple myeloma. The examiner will provide an opinion on its relationship to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,The evidence does not show that POEMS syndrome is related to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,POEMS syndrome and thyroid condition are either multiple myeloma or falls under the category of multiple myeloma. The examiner will provide an opinion on their relationship to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.,The evidence does not show that POEMS syndrome is related to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.

Claimed conditions
sarcoidosis, multiple myeloma, POEMS syndrome, thyroid condition, kidney condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 13, 2022
Citation
22034405

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22034405.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.