Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's lung cancer and its relation to service at Camp Pendleton. The Veteran needs to provide additional information about possible exposures while stationed there, and a new VA examination is required.

The deciding factor: The decision was based on insufficient evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's lung cancer and his service at Camp Pendleton.

Claimed conditions
lung cancer
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 16, 2022
Citation
22035043

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22035043.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.