The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of compliance with prior remand directives regarding the Veteran's suicidal ideation. A new medical examination is required to address this issue.
The deciding factor: The prior remand directive requested that the examiner obtain a more thorough history from the Veteran regarding his history of suicidal ideation and establish that he is not currently at risk of harm to himself or others.
- Claimed conditions
- Suicidal ideation
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 16, 2022
- Citation
- 22035162
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22035162.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran does not require personal care services for a minimum of 6 continuous months based on his inability to perform activities of daily living and need for supervision or protection. However, the decision is remanded due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date of November 29, 2023, for the award of Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU), finding that it was factually ascertainable that the Veteran became unable to secure or maintain substantially gainful employment as of January 16, 2021. The effective date is set at November 29, 2023.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's application for PCAFC was denied due to not meeting the eligibility criteria. The Board has decided to remand the case for a new medical opinion considering his functional abilities and need for caregiver assistance.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted a Level 2 stipend under the PCAFC due to the Veteran's need for continuous supervision and instruction, as he suffers from hallucinations, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and psychosis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.