The Board has remanded the Veteran's case for further development, including a new VA examination to evaluate his NHL residuals and determine if he is entitled to a TDIU due to his service-connected condition.
The deciding factor: The procedural requirements were met, but the rating assigned does not reflect all of the Veteran's current NHL residuals. The Board has therefore remanded for further development.
- Claimed conditions
- NHL (Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 17, 2022
- Citation
- 22035347
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22035347.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's NHL rating was reduced from 100% to 0% in October 2018, but the Board has determined that this reduction did not follow proper procedures. The case is being remanded for a new VA examination to evaluate all current residuals of his service-connected NHL.
- Denied
The Board found that the reduction in the rating for NHL from 100 percent to 10 percent, effective April 1, 1997, was proper. The issue of an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the residuals of an Ommaya shunt placement is referred back to the RO for issuance of a statement of the case.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.