The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of compliance with previous remands and the need for further examination.
The deciding factor: There was not substantial compliance with the April 2020 and April 2021 remand instructions, requiring additional examination.
- Claimed conditions
- verrucous carcinoma of the right false vocal cord
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 21, 2022
- Citation
- 22035681
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22035681.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for verrucous carcinoma of the right false vocal cord and residuals due to a lack of substantial compliance with previous remand instructions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand requests for a VA examination by an oncologist. The Veteran was not provided proper notice and opportunity for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for verrucous carcinoma of the right false vocal cord and residuals, as well as TDIU due to service-connected disabilities. Further examination is needed to determine the current severity of the condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the cases for further development and evaluation due to incomplete examinations and conflicting medical opinions. The Veteran's claims of increased rating for throat cancer and TDIU are inextricably intertwined, so they will be addressed together.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.