The Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded due to the need for additional VA medical records, including those from Tampa VAMC.
The deciding factor: VA duty to assist requires obtaining relevant treatment records, especially as they may contain evidence pertinent to both hip and eye claims.
- Claimed conditions
- left total hip arthroplasty, right eye procedure
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 23, 2022
- Citation
- 22036414
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22036414.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development and examination to ensure compliance with its previous remand instructions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for lumbosacral strain and left total hip arthroplasty as there was no evidence of these conditions in service or within a reasonable time thereafter, and the current conditions were not related to the Veteran's active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of initial and increased ratings for right knee and left hip disabilities due to inadequate VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the VA's actions in providing the 2008 left total hip arthroplasty and 2013 right eye procedure caused additional disability to the Veteran, but it is unclear whether this was due to carelessness or negligence on the part of the VA. The case is being remanded for further examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.