The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a disability rating greater than 10 percent for his peptic ulcer prior to November 25, 2012, and from November 25, 2012, to February 18, 2018. The appeal is also remanded due to the need for a retrospective medical opinion addressing the ameliorative effects of medication on his peptic ulcer symptoms.
The deciding factor: The Board found that prior decisions implicitly considered the ameliorative effects of medication prescribed to treat the Veteran's peptic ulcer, but did not provide adequate reasons or bases for concluding that the Veteran's peptic ulcer symptoms were more consistent with mild rather than moderate disability ratings. The Court also noted that the Board failed to address whether higher evaluations are warranted once those effects are discounted.
- Claimed conditions
- peptic ulcer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 29, 2022
- Citation
- 22037444
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22037444.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for service connection for a peptic ulcer and an initial rating for his right shoulder disability. The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for the peptic ulcer and the right shoulder disability, while denying an increased rating for the right shoulder disability and remanding the issue of effective date for TDIU prior to January 4, 2014.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence received since the November 2023 SSOC, and for an addendum VA opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's gastrointestinal disorder.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction, both presumed to be due to herbicide exposure. The claims for hypertrophy of the prostate, migraine headaches, and peptic ulcer were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for an adequate VA examination and to obtain missing treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.