The Board has determined that the Veteran's February 2007 claim for a 'right hand scar that is tender' reasonably encompassed a related claim for a right wrist and right hand disability. The November 2011 Board decision implicitly denied this claim, and as the Veteran did not appeal this implicit denial, it remains final. The matter of service connection for a right wrist and right hand disability is REMANDED due to the need for updated VA treatment records and an examination.
The deciding factor: The November 2011 Board decision implicitly denied the claim for service connection for a right wrist and right hand disability, which was part of the February 2007 claim for 'right hand scar that is tender'. The Veteran did not appeal this implicit denial.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Hand Scar, Right Wrist Disability, Ulnar Nerve Disability (residuals of right hand injury)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 6, 2022
- Citation
- 22038394
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22038394.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's right ring finger disability and associated right hand scar are each rated at 10 percent. The Veteran is granted a separate 10 percent rating for his right hand scar, effective March 9, 2007. Separate ratings of 10 percent are assigned for peripheral neuropathy with carpal tunnel syndrome in both upper extremities and for peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for a second extension of his delimiting date beyond March 26, 2023, for Post-9/11 GI Bill educational assistance benefits due to lack of medical infeasibility and inability to initiate or complete education during his period of eligibility.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claims for erectile dysfunction and voiding dysfunction have been denied due to the lack of evidence linking these conditions to his in-service exposure.,The remaining service connection claims (for bilateral feet, ankles, hip, wrist, cervical spine, upper extremity radiculopathy, psychiatric disorder, GERD, sleep apnea, and hypertension) are remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for right shoulder and right wrist disabilities due to a lack of medical opinions addressing the etiology of these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.