The Board denied a rating in excess of 40 percent for the Veteran's synovitis and myositis of the right knee, finding that his symptoms did not warrant such a higher rating based on limitation of motion.
The deciding factor: The evidence showed limited range of motion but no additional functional loss or pathology that would justify a higher rating under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- synovitis, myositis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 8, 2022
- Citation
- 22039128
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22039128.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's SMC and TDIU claims are remanded due to a duty to assist error regarding the assessment of his service-connected bilateral hand palmar hyperkeratosis. A VA examination is needed to determine if there is loss of use of the hands, including distinguishing between symptoms attributable to the service-connected condition and any non-service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran developed myopathy, myositis, rhabdomyolysis and other residuals due to statin use prescribed by VA. The Board found that the disability was not caused by or proximately caused by VA's fault or an unforeseen event.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew the appeal for service connection for myositis, and it has been dismissed.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for myositis, finding no nexus between the condition and either active duty or a service-connected disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.