The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicides in Korea and to obtain a retrospective medical opinion on whether his pain and discomfort, possibly related to herbicide exposure, contributed to his suicide.
The deciding factor: The Board found insufficient evidence to verify the Veteran's alleged exposure to herbicides while stationed at the Korean DMZ and requires further development including obtaining unit records and providing a retrospective medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's cause of death and his active service.
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to head
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 14, 2022
- Citation
- 22040440
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22040440.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.