The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's bilateral eye symptoms are attributable to his service-connected Meibomian gland dysfunction.
The deciding factor: The previous examinations were inadequate and did not address whether the Veteran's bilateral eye symptoms are attributable to his service-connected Meibomian gland dysfunction.
- Claimed conditions
- Meibomian gland dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 21, 2022
- Citation
- 22041730
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22041730.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's bilateral dry eye syndrome with meibomian gland dysfunction is not rated compensably, and the issue of individual unemployability during the period on appeal is dismissed as moot.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for sinusitis is denied, and his claims for TDIU prior to September 21, 2018 are also denied. His TDIU from September 21, 2018 is moot due to the grant of SMC at the S-1 level.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected Meibomian gland dysfunction is granted an initial 10 percent disability rating, effective October 1, 2010.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and secondary service connection for a bilateral eye disability, finding that there was no evidence linking his current eye disabilities to his period of active service or diabetes mellitus.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.