The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding whether topical medications used by the Veteran are systemic therapy, which could affect his rating for athlete's foot and toenail fungus.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not account for all topical medications prescribed to the Veteran and failed to consider the Veteran's testimony about past oral medication use.
- Claimed conditions
- Athlete's Foot (Tinea Pedis), Toenail Fungus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 25, 2022
- Citation
- 22042252
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22042252.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from securing and following substantially gainful employment, as he is currently employed by the United States Federal Government.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C, sleep apnea, a toenail fungus, GERD with constipation, PTSD, diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity (sciatic nerve), peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity (sciatic nerve), peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity (anterior crural nerve), and peripheral neuropathy of the right upper and left upper extremities. The Veteran's claims for service connection were not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence to support service connection for toenail fungus or sleep apnea as directly related to the Veteran's active service, including herbicide exposure. The VA examiner provided negative opinions that these conditions were not caused by or aggravated by his diabetes mellitus type 2.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's current toenail fungus did not have its clinical onset in service and is not otherwise related to active duty. The claim was denied as there was no evidence of a nexus between the current condition and service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.