Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's earlier effective date claims for overactive bladder and ED have been withdrawn. The Board has also granted service connection for hypertension and fecal incontinence.,The Veteran's bilateral hip disabilities (left and right hips) are remanded for further development as the VA examination is inadequate to address secondary aggravation or direct service connection.,The Veteran's scars, related to his right total hip arthroplasty, are also remanded for a more current evaluation.,The Veteran's erectile dysfunction claim is remanded due to the lack of recent medical evidence and an updated examination.

The deciding factor: The earlier effective date claims have been withdrawn by the Veteran or his representative. The Board has found that the Veteran conceded the assigned effective dates for these claims.,The VA examiner's opinion was inadequate as it did not address secondary aggravation or direct service connection. Therefore, further development is needed to determine if the hip disabilities are caused or aggravated by the Veteran's back disability.,The remanded claim for scars requires a more current evaluation due to the passage of time since the last examination and the Veteran's reported worsening condition.,The remanded erectile dysfunction claim requires an updated VA examination as it has been over four years since the last examination, which may not reflect the current severity of the disability.

Claimed conditions
overactive bladder, ed (erectile dysfunction), hypertension, fecal incontinence, degenerative arthritis of the left hip, right hip disability (osteoarthritis status post total hip arthroplasty), scars, to include secondary to right total hip arthroplasty
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 25, 2022
Citation
22042273

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22042273.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.