Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's mood disorder is caused by his service-connected disabilities.,There is approximately an even balance of evidence as to whether the Veteran's bilateral blepharitis, combined senile cataracts, and pinguecula are caused by his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.,With reasonable doubt resolved in favor of the Veteran, there is approximately an even balance of evidence as to whether his benign prostate hypertrophy is caused by his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus. His diabetic neurogenic bladder is caused by his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran's diabetic neurogenic bladder is caused by his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.

The deciding factor: Current psychiatric disability has been demonstrated, and the opinion supports that the Veteran's current mood disorder is caused, at least partially, by his service-connected disabilities.,There are conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's eye disabilities are caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The evidence is approximately evenly balanced as to this issue.,The Veteran has current benign prostate hypertrophy and diabetic neurogenic bladder. There are conflicting medical opinions regarding whether his benign prostate hypertrophy is caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, but the opinion supports that his diabetic neurogenic bladder is caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.,There are conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's prostate disability is caused by his diabetes mellitus. The evidence is approximately evenly balanced as to this issue.

Claimed conditions
mood disorder, bilateral blepharitis, combined senile cataracts, pinguecula, benign prostate hypertrophy, diabetic neurogenic bladder
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 29, 2022
Citation
22043390

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22043390.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.