Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for a compensable rating for bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes planus, service connection for bilateral osteoarthritis of the feet secondary to service connected bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes planus, service connection for vertigo, including dizziness and giddiness, secondary to service connected migraine headaches and/or tinnitus, and service connection for a traumatic brain injury are all remanded.,The Veteran's claims will be further evaluated based on the evidence provided during the hearing and any additional records obtained.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has not been afforded an updated VA examination to assess the current severity of his bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes planus, as well as for his claimed bilateral osteoarthritis of the feet. Additionally, a new theory of entitlement is needed for service connection of vertigo due to service connected migraine headaches and/or tinnitus. Lastly, a new VA examination is required to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's traumatic brain injury.,The Veteran has not been afforded an updated VA examination to assess his bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes planus, as well as for his claimed bilateral osteoarthritis of the feet. Additionally, a new theory of entitlement is needed for service connection of vertigo due to service connected migraine headaches and/or tinnitus. Lastly, a new VA examination is required to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's traumatic brain injury.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, bilateral plantar fasciitis and pes planus, bilateral osteoarthritis of the feet, vertigo (including dizziness and giddiness), traumatic brain injury
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 1, 2022
Citation
22043487

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22043487.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.