The Board has remanded the cases of meatal stenosis and BXO for further examination to determine their etiology and whether they are related to service.
The deciding factor: Further medical evaluation is needed to clarify the nature and cause of the claimed disabilities, including their relationship to active service.
- Claimed conditions
- meatal stenosis, balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 2, 2022
- Citation
- 22043715
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22043715.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there have been issues with the development of records and opinions related to the Veteran's claims for service connection. The GERD, OSA, headaches, and BXO claims are all remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome was dismissed. The appeals for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), diarrhea, left knee disability, headaches, obstructive sleep apnea, vitiligo, and balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) were remanded.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's genitourinary disability, claimed as urinary stricture and meatal stenosis, is not related to his active service. The VA examiners concluded that any current condition is more likely due to BPH (benign prostatic hypertrophy) rather than a service-related issue.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for meatal stenosis, finding that his symptoms did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.