The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination reports and failure to comply with prior remand instructions. The Veteran's left femur fracture disability is being reviewed for increased ratings.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations did not comply with the Board's previous remand instructions regarding range of motion measurements and functional loss assessments.
- Claimed conditions
- Left femur fracture, Knee disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 3, 2022
- Citation
- 22044081
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22044081.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's TDIU claim is denied because he is already receiving a combined rating of 100% for his service-connected psychiatric and knee disabilities, which means he is not considered unemployable due to any single disability alone.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's application for eligibility to enroll in VA's PCAFC was denied due to not meeting the medical eligibility criteria. The Board has ordered a remand because there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding an inadequate medical opinion from the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has dismissed the appeal concerning an effective date prior to November 1, 2015, for the award of a separate disability rating for instability of the left ankle. The remaining issues on appeal have been remanded due to new evidence and need further development.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss due to a lack of evidence showing a current disability, in-service incurrence or aggravation, and a causal relationship between the claimed condition and active duty. The remaining claims were remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.