Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's mild atrophy of left thigh quadriceps muscle group XIV is currently rated as 40 percent disabling, which is the maximum schedular rating available.,For asthma prior to February 18, 2018, a higher rating of 30 percent is not warranted. For asthma effective February 18, 2018, a higher rating of 60 percent is not warranted.,The Veteran's acne does not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating.,For ulcer syndrome with pancreatitis effective January 27, 2010, a higher than 30 percent rating is not warranted.,Left shoulder and right shoulder disabilities are remanded for further evaluation.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's mild atrophy of left thigh quadriceps muscle group XIV has been rated as the maximum schedular rating available under Diagnostic Code 5314, which does not allow for a higher rating.,For asthma prior to February 18, 2018, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a 30 percent rating based on FEV-1 and FEV-1/FVC results. For asthma effective February 18, 2018, the Veteran's FEV-1 was 71 percent and FEV-1/FVC was 80 percent, which does not meet the criteria for a 60 percent rating.,The Veteran's acne did not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7828.,For ulcer syndrome with pancreatitis effective January 27, 2010, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a 30 percent rating based on symptoms and treatment needs.,Left shoulder and right shoulder disabilities are remanded as there is insufficient evidence to determine their current severity.

Claimed conditions
mild atrophy of left thigh quadriceps muscle group XIV, asthma, acne, ulcer syndrome with pancreatitis, fracture of the left little finger
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 4, 2022
Citation
22044337

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22044337.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.