Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The appeal for an effective date earlier than July 29, 2015, for award of service connection for lumbar spine DJD and left lower extremity radiculopathy is dismissed.,The claim of service connection for calcified pleural plaques, calcified granulomas, and COPD (claimed as lung condition) due to asbestos exposure has been reopened. The appeal is granted to this extent.,Issues regarding PTSD and depression are remanded for further evaluation.,Entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability (TDIU) is also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew the issues of effective dates earlier than July 29, 2015, for award of service connection for lumbar spine DJD and left lower extremity radiculopathy at his Board hearing.,New evidence received since a final August 2013 rating decision relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for calcified pleural plaques, calcified granulomas, and COPD (claimed as lung condition) due to asbestos exposure. The Veteran's contention regarding asbestos exposure is remanded.,The Veteran testified about his experiences in service that may be related to PTSD and depression, including witnessing dead bodies during search and rescue missions. Further evaluation is needed to determine the validity of these claims.,TDIU claim is also remanded as it involves an assessment of the Veteran's employability due to service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
lumbar spine degenerative joint disease (DJD), left lower extremity radiculopathy, calcified pleural plaques, calcified granulomas, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 10, 2022
Citation
22045265

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22045265.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.