The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's current chronic respiratory condition is related to his military service.
The deciding factor: The medical opinion provided by the Veteran was equivocal, and thus requires further examination to determine if there is a medical nexus between the in-service incident and the current diagnosis.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic respiratory condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 26, 2022
- Citation
- 22048754
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22048754.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for cause of death due to new and relevant evidence related to toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) as directed by the PACT Act.
- Granted
The veteran's claims for service connection for a chronic respiratory condition and right hip osteoarthritis were granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic respiratory condition, and fibromyalgia due to insufficient medical opinions provided by VA. The appellant must be afforded a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for service connection for various conditions, including right knee condition, left knee condition, chronic respiratory condition, psoriasis (claimed as skin disorder), and left upper chest scar/pain. The Veteran submitted new evidence but it was not considered because it consisted of previously uploaded service treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.